The bipartisan trade-dispute panel concluded on Friday in Washington that Mexico’s restrictions on agrochemicals exports from the United States7abb8 -Mexico–Canada Agreement violated the Agreement, giving Biden administration sweeping major trade benefits in its final weeks.
A panel that ruled in favor of any and all seven United States7abb8 legal claims in The long-running instance was announced by The Trade Representative for The United States.The panel concluded that Mexico’s limitations are not scientifically sound and do not align with the USMCA’s hygiene, quarantine, market access, and entomology standards.
The three-member panel’s . Full report. The case suggested that Mexico should align its corn-trade policy initiatives with the trade agreement on entomology within 45 days.
The . Corn dispute. Six months after the implementation of USMCA, when then-President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador issued an edict in December 2020, which prohibited GM maize by 2024, with the primary objective of regulating 7-to-7 maiZE exports from the United States.The strategy has been endorsed by President Claudia Sheinbaum, who became the leader.
USTR requested a resolution to the challenging 2023 edict in Mexico that prohibited the permanent use of GM maize in flatbreads and pastry, and directed government entities to gradually eliminate its use in other food products and mammal feedition7aff7b7.
The United States7abb8 argued that The Mexican government’s claims about human health effects of GM maize were not supported by scientific evidence.
According to a statem7entomology published by the United States Trade Representative Katherine Tai, who spoke on behalf of the panel, the decision confirms the long-standing concerns of many Americans regarding Mexico’s biotechnology policies and their negative impact on agricultural exports.
According to Tai, American growers can compete more effectively with other countries through the implementation of science-based trade policies.
The ministers of Mexico’s industry and agrarian sectors expressed their disagreement with the ruling, but they would still honor it.
The Mexican Government disagrees with the Panel’s decision, stating that the measures in question are consistent with public health and Indigenous rights.
However, they emphasized that settling disputes was an essential aspect of the USMCA trade agreement, noting that Mexico emerged victorious in a recent automobiles dispute.
The report was authored by David Lawder and David Alire Garcia, with Brendan O ‘Boyle contributing to the reporting and Diane Craft and Rod Nickel editing it.