Quick Links
-
Which Music Streaming Service has the highest payout for artists?
-
What is the price range for Other Streaming Services?
-
What is the process of Streaming royalties?
-
Artists Deserve Better Compensation
Summary
- Research indicates that Qobuz and Amazon Music offer the highest per-stream payment to artists
- Despite the high revenues, some of the most prominent music streaming platforms pay artists far less
- The complexity of stream royalties is heightened by factors like geolocation and platform revenue that impact payment methods
Is it your preference to pay for streaming music subscriptions and listeners, or would you prefer to be paid by artists rather than industry executives? I’m considering switching to one of the best-paying music streaming platforms to help Me make a difference
Which Music Streaming Service has the highest payout for artists?
It’s widely understood that the majority of music streaming sites pay meager royalties to the artists who make their platform possible. Although the majority of services have an uniform royalty payment system, some offer higher rates than others. According to music industry insiders YouTube is the channel of Benn Jordan , French company Qobuz sits proudly atop the compensation tree—for now—by paying its artists $0.0136 per stream
Qobuz’s $12 royalty may seem like a small amount. Covering almost 1,000 streams would require a monthly 99-$ subscription. Qobuz is the only music streaming service that currently surpasses the one-cent-per-stream mark, with other platforms falling short. Taking into account social media platforms that offer lower fees and Peloton’s bespoke services, what is their level of success?
What is the price range for Other Streaming Services?

The amount of money paid to artists by music streaming platforms varies according to reports due to the complexity of royalty payments. The results are unexpected, as Benn Jordan, an independent fact checker who consulted with other industry professionals, discusses the findings
Amazon Music receives the second-highest royalties from its Music business, with a total of $0 royalty payments. The number of cents per stream was 0096. This was a positive development, particularly since the site now provides beneficial subscription bundles with Amazon Prime. Tidal, which is often regarded as the most lucrative streaming platform for artists, ranks third with no royalties and costs $0.0078 per stream
One of My favorite streaming platforms , Deezer, pays just $0. At $0, Apple Music offers a lower rate of $0.07 per stream. The currency’s per-dollar conversion rate of 0061 is 164 streams. Last place is shared by YouTube Music and Pandora, both of which cost a meager $0. The cost per stream for Spotify is $0, with a slight increase in the amount. 0029. The Swedish streaming platform is particularly disappointing, given that it is the most popular site by a considerable margin and has abundant resources
Jordan is compensated with five times the salary of the lowest-paying services on Qobuz, but he is an independent musician who owns 100% of his music and publishing rights. It’s important to keep in mind that royalties can fluctuate significantly, based on various factors
What is the process of Streaming royalties?
The complexity of streaming royalties is often comparable to that of a John Coltrane sax solo artist. Depending on the number of streams, the revenue generated by a streaming service through advertisements or subscriptions is divided among the rights holders. The rights holders, including record labels, publishers, and artists, do not receive all of the royalties from the songs they write or perform
The distribution of money to the rights holders is determined by the revenue model of the streaming platform and the market share of a particular country. Artists in countries with higher subscription rates, such as the United States and Europe, tend to receive greater payouts
Artists Deserve Better Compensation
There has always been a debate over compensation for artists. Despite the fact that music is now widely available through streaming services, many musicians claim that they are not paid fairly for their work
According to critics, streaming platforms like Spotify prioritize growth over fair pay for creators. This has led some artists, such as Taylor Swift and Jay-Z, to advocate for higher royalty payments and greater transparency in the payment process. Conversely, Spotify offers to Repay their artists even less royalties In exchange for advertising on its site
If we, as fans, are concerned about the fair payment of artists, we may need to rethink our approach to music consumption. If you want to maximize your earnings, consider switching to a streaming service like Qobuz or Amazon Music, which offers better payouts. Despite the unparalleled convenience of streaming services, it’s crucial to keep in mind that music creators must be compensated fairly for their work